Home ] Up ] Work & Campaigns ] My Books ] En d'Autres Langues ] CV/Kids/Photos ] Search this Website ]

Land Reform and the Pavarotti Effect

 

Land reform threatened by the “Pavarotti Effect”

 

 

Published in the West Highland Free Press, 9 November 2001, p. 10.

 

 

Alastair McIntosh, a founding trustee of the original Isle of Eigg Trust, warns of the “Pavarotti Effect” that threatens land reform.

 

 

 

An “irreversible shift” has taken place “in public policy towards the issue of land ownership in Scotland,” Brian Wilson MP told the London Committee of the Scottish Landowners’ Federation in June 2000. “Land reform has now become a litmus test by which the Parliament and Executive would be judged.”

 

It gave me considerable satisfaction to quote these words, not only in Soil and Soul, my recent book about Scottish land reform and globalisation, but also, in this month’s Le Monde Diplomatique – Europe’s most influential political newspaper, which prints 1.2 million copies worldwide.

 

In these writings I’ve also quoted Alasdair Morrison MSP. Speaking around the same time as Wilson’s magnificent speech, he said: “Notice has now been served on rapacious landowners who have abused wealth and privilege. An unstoppable reforming process has begun.”

 

Brave words, but as Wilson and Morrison know, the challenge facing Parliament over these next few weeks is pass that litmus test without being forced to drink vinegar. That’s why some of us are doing our damnedest to make sure that the eyes of the world are on Scotland. History’s witnesses are waiting.

 

If our elected representatives fail us, disappointment and anger will be felt far beyond the Scottish Highlands. What’s happening with land reform in Scotland is being seen as a pattern and example for elsewhere. That is why Gigha was even on French TV last week. And why the 1997 campaign to buy Eigg succeeded due not only to one big donation of a million pounds, but also to 10,000 smaller contributions, totalling £600,000.

 

I remember seeing one letter in the interim Trust office - Maggie Fyffe’s kitchen on Eigg. It was from “unemployed” of London and contained a £2 donation. The covering note simply said, “It gives me hope,” and countless other letters expressed similar feeling.

 

Today, only a powerful, concentrated, well connected and richly resourced lobby stands between the residual legacy of feudalism and that hope. Their own language betrays them. Consider, for example, this splendid statement, quoted in The Herald of 17th September, from David Cotton of the so-called Crofting Counties Fishing Rights Group: “We are a totally independent body, representing grassroots salmon and sea trout river workers, including ghillies, bailiffs, fishery scientists, managers, and hatchery operators. We also represent their wives who may work in the fishing lodges or the wee local shops, and their families.”

 

Analyse the role of women in that one, and you see the name of the game – all the way through to “the rich man in his castle, the poor man at this gate.”

 

As Calum MacDonald MP told a conference organised by Land Reform Scotland earlier this year, the crofting right to buy, with sporting rights, is the forthcoming Land Reform (Scotland) Bill’s most vital reform. However, it is the basis by which land will be valued that will determine whether the Bill makes much difference.

 

The draft Bill envisages land transfers taking place at market valuation. Apart from the ethics of having to buy back what was once, in effect, stolen property, or what can already be bought back individually for a mere fifteen times annual crofting rental, this could be positively dangerous. What makes it retrogressive could be called, “the Pavarotti Effect.”

 

In the last days before the fake “Professor” Maruma, successor to Keith Schellenberg, was forced to sell the Isle of Eigg, a mysterious outfit materialised – the Pavarotti Foundation.

 

This threatened to buy the island like a giant floating Mod – turning it into an “opera college” for three thousand aspiring crooners!

 

The Foundation’s smarmy and ever-smiling besuited consultants went to meet with Highland Council to discuss the plan, allegedly patronised by the Italian tenor, Luciano Pavarotti.

 

But the mirage evaporated when Pavarotti disclaimed sponsorship. The Foundation’s manager was exposed as being one and the same as Maruma’s principal creditor - Hans-Dieter Kals - desperate to recoup the money put in by himself, a retired scientist called Willy Hermann, and a Stuttgart hotelier by the name of Zimmerman.

 

It was, seemingly, all just a ruse to up the ante in the bidding stakes. It was an effort to frighten the newly-formed Isle of Eigg Heritage Trust into paying over the odds.

 

Eigg wasn’t fooled, but how do we know that Gigha hasn’t been taken in?

 

We’re given to understand that Derek Holt, the erstwhile laird, altruistically accepted £4 million in the face of higher bids of £5 million, or was it £7 million – the figure fluctuates.

 

How do we know that these were genuine? After all, would any millionaire in their right mind want to buy a reclusive retreat where the residents have just voted for revolution?

 

If the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill goes through on the basis of “market valuation,” and if there’s no qualification of what that means, what is there to stop landowners from manipulating market values? The existence of secretive companies like Vibel SA, owners of Durness, show that corporate power can operate from behind a curtain of perfect anonymity.

 

Set in this light, it becomes apparent that legislation permitting community buy-outs at market valuation could actually work against land reform. This is because prominent buy-outs like Eigg and Assynt happened not at market valuation, but because of market spoiling.

 

There was nothing new about this idea. Those of us instrumental in establishing the original Isle of Eigg Trust got it not from our own brains, but rather, from James Hunter’s book, The Making of the Crofting Community!

 

Hunter tells how the perpetrators of the 1887 Pairc Deer Raid were not just trying to satisfy their hunger. They also hoped that “the sporting value of Park forest would be so drastically reduced that its tenant would give it up, thus forcing Lady Matheson to [hand it] over to the crofters.”

 

In modern parlance, the name of the game had to be to wipe out what Keith Schellenberg called, the “collector’s item” premium in Scottish land values.

 

Land reform legislation stipulating market valuation, without any qualification of what that means, could actually damage the future use of this tactic.

 

It could set a price higher than the market might bear given the “perfect market information” that, quite frankly, a new laird would be an unwelcome neighbour!

 

Simple market valuation could play into the hands of landed power by setting the “market value” at whatever some trumped-up Pavarotti might sing for.

 

That is why our MSPs need to consider specifying a realistic market value - market valuation based on economic value.

 

That way, communities would be taking on loans no greater than what the well-managed economic output of their place could sustain.

 

Land reform legislation would protect them from the siren-call of the Pavarotti Effect.

 

 

 

Alastair McIntosh is author of Soil and Soul: People versus Corporate Power (Aurum Press, £17.99). He will speak at a book signing in An Lanntair, Stornoway, at 8.00 pm tomorrow (Friday). 

 

 

 

 

 

Internet Users Please Note: The material on this page is original text as submitted to the publication stated beneath the title. As the editing process means that some parts may have been cut, altered or corrected after it left my hands, or I might have made minor subsequent amendments, or scanned material may contain scanning errors, please specify in citation “internet version from www.AlastairMcIntosh.com as well as citing the place of first publication. Note that author particulars, including contact address(es) and organisational affiliations may have changed since first publication.

This material is © Alastair McIntosh and any co-authors and/or first publishers. However (and without prejudice to any legal rights of co-authors or the original or subsequent publishers), I give my permission for it to be freely copied for non-commercial educational purposes provided that due acknowledgement is given. Please advise of any uses that might particularly interest me. For commercial enquires, please contact original publishers and/or email me, mail@AlastairMcIntosh.com. Thanks, folks, and enjoy, enjoy, enjoy!

To RETURN to any sub-index from which you approached this page, click BACK on your web browser. To return to my homepage, click “Home” above.

 

 

22 November 2001

www.AlastairMcIntosh.com

Hit Counter